Repository intent, with provenance
Path-scoped rules carry stable IDs, validation state, source, and expiry. Stale or conflicting memory cannot silently become truth.
Ahem remembers the rules your code cannot explain, routes each change to the right AI reviewer, and returns one evidence-backed verdict—not a pile of bot comments.
Read-only review · ZDR model routing · no repository code execution
The changed production path fails closed unless TLS is fully configured.
Every review starts from a bounded Git change and the few validated repository invariants relevant to it.
Path-scoped rules carry stable IDs, validation state, source, and expiry. Stale or conflicting memory cannot silently become truth.
Ordinary changes get correctness. Auth and tenant boundaries get security. Migrations and deploys get release review.
High-risk findings face an independent arbiter. Repetition does not make a weak claim stronger.
The TLS requirement is enforced outside explicit development and test environments.
Two model calls on a real Syntropy security change. The arbiter rejected the noisy claim and preserved a clean verdict.
Early internal validation on an eight-change Syntropy replay; not a guarantee of future defect detection. Cost comparison uses recorded successful model responses under the tested routing profiles.
Tell us where your code lives. We’re starting with Forgejo and Gitea teams that care about private, explainable merge protection.